View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
max,(comma) Trick Member
Joined: 28 Feb 2005
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
J. S. Mill Maniac Member
Joined: 28 Apr 2003 Location: New York, New York |
1. Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2005 12:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Nothing is hard about it. There are just five hundred steps and a whole lot of gallops, so it's a bit hard to AAA. Otherwise, not hard at all. _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Reenee Trick Member
Joined: 21 Nov 2003
|
2. Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2005 1:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Stamina issues, I presume. That's probably the only thing against the player. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Legend Of Nilo Trick Member
Joined: 15 Dec 2004
|
3. Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2005 1:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So Deep isn't hard at all, just play it on 2x and on flat. It's that easy . |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nystargate Maniac Member
Joined: 29 Jan 2002 Location: Somewhere out there |
4. Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2005 1:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Its hard if you don't have the stamina or if you can't do the gallops. In addition this song requires a different kind of stamina too - leg stamina. I know about a third of the way into the song my legs get weird and then around the halfway point they stiffen up and don't want to move anymore... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
[ES] GARYsurvivor Trick Member
Joined: 12 Oct 2004 Location: Lakewood, CO |
5. Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2005 2:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I really can't see why it is such a stamina issue. I see other people play it all funny and they seem to try WAY too hard. I just kinda flow around the pad effortlessly and I have no problems. I think it just got too big of a reputation that it freaks people out.
Legend of Nilo wrote: | So Deep isn't hard at all, just play it on 2x and on flat. It's that easy . |
Reverse dark 1x on flat AA is easier! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Legend Of Nilo Trick Member
Joined: 15 Dec 2004
|
6. Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2005 2:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
GARYsurvivor wrote: | I really can't see why it is such a stamina issue. I see other people play it all funny and they seem to try WAY too hard. I just kinda flow around the pad effortlessly and I have no problems. I think it just got too big of a reputation that it freaks people out.
Legend of Nilo wrote: | So Deep isn't hard at all, just play it on 2x and on flat. It's that easy . |
Reverse dark 1x on flat AA is easier! | sounds interesting, i'm going to start practicing on that soon. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Daggett Trick Member
Joined: 22 Sep 2004 Location: Corona, CA |
7. Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2005 4:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's a 9 because:
1. If you're new into the 9 foot range, the song is an energy drainer.
2. Slightly difficult to sight read if you're not used to it.
3. PA like Kiba said. _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
-SuperZero3 Gold- Trick Member
Joined: 26 Aug 2004 Location: Chattanooga, Tn |
8. Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2005 4:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's not hard, but if you're a noob and you are just moving up to heavy and you see that song on 1x, it's extremely intimidating.
498 steps=Freak Out! _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
ICNH Trick Member
Joined: 06 Sep 2004 Location: Mahwah, NJ |
9. Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2005 4:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think this should go in the DDR Gameplay Forum.
But So Deep is REALLY hard to PA, at least for me. I get 30+ greats on it on a good day. _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bliznab Trick Member
Joined: 10 Jul 2004 Location: Palm Springs, CA |
|
Back to top |
|
|
MAAAX_himself Trick Member
Joined: 12 Jul 2004 Location: Maysville, Kentucky |
11. Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2005 6:55 pm Post subject: Re: what is so hard about So Deep? |
|
|
max,(comma) wrote: | So Deep heavy isnt hard at all, its a big pattern. in the beginning its the same thing like 5-8 times. then the same thing but a different pattern for 5-8 times etc...the patterns are pretty much all gallops too. The ending might be a bit troublesome but just pop in ddrmax2 and slow the song down, with handclap. |
I completly aggree except it is kind of tiering
But i do love this song AA |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SO! loves Electroplankton Trick Member
Joined: 22 Dec 2002 Location: mommy told me not to say! |
12. Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2005 7:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's not hard at all. I mean, all it does is completely make your legs feel like jellow and then make them unable to move. whats hard about that? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
claw Trick Member
Joined: 19 Jul 2004 Location: Brampton/Mississauga, Ontario |
13. Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2005 7:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
like that other guy said, this song is different from others in that it is not so much cardio as it is muscular endurance. some people have a tendancy to gallop on their toes meaning this song takes alot more out of them leg wise. i dont think theres much more to say than that. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
LittleMike LOL Trick Member
Joined: 14 May 2004 Location: MIT / Long Island, NY |
14. Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2005 7:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I think So Deep is also the 2nd longest song in the game at 1:42 (Kakumei is 1:52 I believe...but doesn't have nearly as many steps).
The Least 100 Seconds is 1:40 (ZOMG 100 SECONDS!!1!1!!1oneoneone) and 300 BPM so that is a harder 9. I think it has a comprable number of steps (though not as many). |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DeeEckzWhy! Trick Member
Joined: 22 Jul 2004 Location: Hudson Falls, New York |
15. Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2005 8:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
[RiVAL] LittleMike wrote: | I think So Deep is also the 2nd longest song in the game at 1:42 (Kakumei is 1:52 I believe...but doesn't have nearly as many steps).
The Least 100 Seconds is 1:40 (ZOMG 100 SECONDS!!1!1!!1oneoneone) and 300 BPM so that is a harder 9. I think it has a comprable number of steps (though not as many). |
Uh... No?
It's 264 BPM or somewhere close and it's only 8 feet...[/b] _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Slowpoke Trick Member
Joined: 28 Oct 2003
|
16. Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2005 8:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
skullman7 wrote: | I think this should go in the DDR Gameplay Forum.
|
Actually, it should go into the Let's-All-Wave-Our-Schlongs-Around-By-Calling-a-Hard-Song-"Easy" Forum.
Oh wait, I just noticed we don't have one of those. In that case, I'd like to suggest we open one up as the dumping ground for posts like these. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Legend Of Nilo Trick Member
Joined: 15 Dec 2004
|
17. Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2005 8:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
thepinkdoomofmonkeys wrote: | It's not hard, but if you're a noob and you are just moving up to heavy and you see that song on 1x, it's extremely intimidating.
498 steps=Freak Out! | Last I checked the song had 500 steps |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Davyinatoga Trick Member
Joined: 03 Nov 2004 Location: SW Vermon' Currently Banned |
18. Posted: Sun Mar 20, 2005 9:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's when they toss in those extra 16th notes, that's when it gets tricky. If you notice, a lot of songs that have any 16th notes in them usually are 8-9 feet (10s go too fast for 16ths, except for bag, but we don't need to go there). And gallops are hard when you have to keep using different arrows. _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
DeeEckzWhy! Trick Member
Joined: 22 Jul 2004 Location: Hudson Falls, New York |
19. Posted: Mon Mar 21, 2005 10:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
Legend of Nilo wrote: | thepinkdoomofmonkeys wrote: | It's not hard, but if you're a noob and you are just moving up to heavy and you see that song on 1x, it's extremely intimidating.
498 steps=Freak Out! | Last I checked the song had 500 steps |
Nope. So Deep has 498 steps. That one jump at the end makes for a 500 combo. _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|