View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Roseanne Connor Trick Member
Joined: 22 May 2002 Location: Lanford, Illinois |
0. Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2005 10:07 pm Post subject: Accuracy of Calorie Mode? |
|
|
Hey guys, I was just wondering how accurate you think the calorie counter on ITG is? _________________
Extremely Baked Tautology wrote: | mtwieg wrote: | I don't think they even got to thermodynamics... |
and my statics class never got to chaucer |
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Alezay Trick Member
Joined: 21 Mar 2005 Location: Looking At The Sky..... |
1. Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2005 10:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It's not. _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
cfusionpm Trick Member
Joined: 24 Jan 2002 Location: San Diego, CA |
2. Posted: Tue Jul 19, 2005 11:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
yeah, i dont think i burned 6000 calories in one day. _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
PedanticOmbudsman Trick Member
Joined: 07 Jan 2005 Location: Fayetteville, AR |
3. Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2005 5:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
Accuracy = 0.
The arcade's calorie counter is probably about 2 or 3 times too high (though at least it's somewhat consistent), and the PS2 version is probably close to 10 times too high (and very inconsistent thanks to a glitch).
I wouldn't use the calorie meter at all ... just go for a particular amount of time or a particular number of songs, and find the difficulty level that leaves you exhausted by still able to stand up after that amount of time. _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
arnoct Trick Member
Joined: 11 Nov 2003 Location: Oshawa, Ontario, Canada |
4. Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2005 7:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
Apparantly the calorie counter is like that because of a bug that shifts the decimal over a place. I remember reading somewhere that if you put you weigh 1/10th of what you actually weigh (for example 180 -> 18) it's more accurate. _________________
/robodex two thousand and five
/#bemani on irc.dynastynet.net -- talk about bemani stuff. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Alezay Trick Member
Joined: 21 Mar 2005 Location: Looking At The Sky..... |
5. Posted: Wed Jul 20, 2005 8:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
^ I'm gonna try that and see what happens. _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
elementis0 Trick Member
Joined: 01 Nov 2004
|
6. Posted: Fri Jul 22, 2005 12:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
arnoct wrote: | Apparantly the calorie counter is like that because of a bug that shifts the decimal over a place. I remember reading somewhere that if you put you weigh 1/10th of what you actually weigh (for example 180 -> 18) it's more accurate. |
now way 180 would never equal 18 thats not right because if i burn 150calories on a hard expert song it definitly wont be 15 calories more like 30 or 40. so maybe reduced by like 1/3 or somthing _________________
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|